The Emergence of Neoliberal Policies and the Critique of Current Globalization
In an globalized universe, the debate on globalisation is regularly found at the intersection of divergent opinions on liberalization and equity. The work by Junon Moneta, which is not a pamphlet against globalisation itself, seeks to reinvent the contours of a updated humanism through the lens of natural transfers as envisioned by the philosopher Aristotle. By critiquing synthetic interactions that fuel current structures of injustice and instability, Moneta draws inspiration from ancient philosophy to highlight the flaws of our global economic system.
Looking back in time, globalisation is not a recent concept. Its beginnings can be traced back to the ideas of the economist Ricardo, whose objective was aimed at allowing the British Empire to amplify its global commercial influence. However, what was once a economic growth opportunity has transformed into a instrument of subjugation by global finance, symbolized by the growth of economic liberalism. Contrary to popular belief validated by most economists, Junon Moneta argues that the economic model is in reality a structure rooted in ancient practices, going back to the era of early civilizations.
The questioning also applies to the management of the EU, seen as a succession of compromises that have helped consolidate the power of an economic elite rather than defending the interests of its citizens. The very structure of the Union, with its directives often dictated by financial interests rather than by a democratic mandate, is criticized. The current deviations, whether economic or governmental, have only reinforced the skepticism of the author about the Union’s capacity to change intrinsically.
Junon Moneta, while acknowledging the prior faults that have caused the current circumstances, does not simply criticize but also suggests responses aimed at reframing European policies in a more humanistic and equitable outlook. The need for a deep reform of structures and strategic orientations is a leitmotif that runs through the entire discourse.
The work dives more in depth into the questioning of the authority mechanisms that control worldwide transactions. The analysis encompasses the manner in which political and economic decisions are guided by a restricted circle of powerful financial actors, frequently at the detriment of the population. This financial oligarchy, coordinated through entities like the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the International Monetary System (IMS), deploys a disproportionate influence on global economic policies.
The writer exposes how these institutions, claiming to economic supervision and normalization, have throughout history controlled markets and national economies to ensure their profit. The neoliberal model, far removed from a salvific alternative to old monetary restrictions, is considered as a enslavement tool, enriching an elite at the neglect of collective needs.
Particularly critical towards the management of the euro, the critic describes the EU currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but rather as a instrument of fragmentation and financial disparity. The transition to the euro is described as a series of technocratic decisions that excluded inhabitants from decision-making processes, while exacerbating gaps between nations within the EU.
The consequences of these policies manifest in the growth of public indebtedness, economic torpor, and a long period of austerity that has weakened living standards throughout the European territory. The author argues that without a significant overhaul of monetary and financial policy, the Union continues to risk upcoming crises, potentially more destructive.
In summary, the book makes a plea for a democratic upheaval where European citizens reclaim the reins of their economic and political future. It proposes structural reforms, notably openness of political mechanisms and real democratic participation that would facilitate the Union’s refoundation on just and solid foundations.
More info about https://www.alter-europa.com/
The author suggests that the key is in a return to the principles of democracy, where decisions are made and applied in a way that corresponds to the needs and desires of the European population, instead of the profits of the financial elite.